#4
The first thing I noticed when inspecting the top of the test
scoring math model (Table 25) was that the variation within the central cell field has a different
reference point (external to the data) than the variation between scores in the
marginal cell column (internal to
the data). Also the variation within the central cell field (the variance) is
harvested in two ways: within rows (scores) and within columns (items).

I obtained the overall shape of these two variances by
folding Chart 64 and Chart 65 into Photo 64-65. The result is a dome or a depression above or below the upper
floor of the model.
The peak of the dome (maximum variance) is reached when a
student functioning at 50% marks an item with 50% difficulty. Standardized test makers try to
maximize this feature of the model. The larger the mismatch between item
difficulty and student ability, the lower down the position of the variance on
the dome. CAT attempts to adjust
item difficulty to match student preparedness.

The total test variance within items is then the sum of the
variance within all items (0.04 to 0.25 = 2.96). The total test variance within
scores is the sum of the variance of all scores (0.05 to 0.24 = 3.33). See
Table 8.

The variance within
columns and rows spreads across the static frame of the model. The model then
adjusts to fit the variance between
scores (rows) to match the spread of the active within rows.
I can see another interpretation of the model variance if
the dome is inverted as a depression. As a flight instrument on a blimp: pitch,
roll, and yaw (within item, 2.96; within score, 3.31; and between scores, 4.10)
the blimp would have the nose up, rolled to the side, and with the rudder hard
over.
- - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Free
software to help you and your students experience and understand how to break
out of traditional-multiple choice (TMC) and into Knowledge and Judgment
Scoring (KJS) (tricycle to bicycle):
No comments:
Post a Comment